He didn’t kill the 4-year-old girl.

He didn’t kill the 4-year-old girl.

manArizona He was released from prison after spending nearly 30 years on death row for a tragic mistrial. Barry Joneswho was serving condemnation for one death girl At the age of four, he became a free man again at the age of 64. His release was ordered after a state judge in the district Tucson He agreed to a plea deal between the prosecution and the prisoner, who pleaded guilty to a less serious charge Second degree murder For not seeking urgent care for the child. A medical review of the case failed to conclude that Jones caused the fatal injuries. The new 25-year prison sentence has already been served, paving the way for his release. His attorney, Carrie Sandman, said the plea bargain acknowledges that his client spent most of his life on death row “despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence.”

Keeler’s mother is serving 20 years in prison for killing her children, but today she’s being pardoned: ‘Everyone died of natural causes’

Alex killed his father to defend his mother: ‘I had to because I risked dying like Jessica Mallage’

Barry Jones, the little girl who died at the age of four

In May 1994, Jones drove Rachel Gray and her mother—his girlfriend at the time—to the hospital, where she was pronounced dead. Investigators determined that Rachel died from a ruptured small intestine caused by blunt trauma to the abdomen. Authorities accused Jones of beating and raping the young girl, a move that led to her arrest and execution.

the operation

Prosecutors relied on junk science to argue that there was overwhelming evidence that Rachel’s injuries occurred the day before her death, while she was under Jones’ sole care. His attorney has not contested the claim or investigated. Jones resumed. Experts eventually found evidence that Rachel’s fatal injury occurred prior to the penultimate day of her life, while she was not in Jones’ care. The judge ordered the defendant’s release or a retrial. It was upheld by the appeals court but overturned by the Supreme Court, under which the federal legal system generally prohibits consideration of new evidence of ineffective legal aid. Thus, the only way out was a plea deal in which Jones had to admit that he had “failed to seek or contributed to the failure to seek medical attention for Rachel Gray”.

See also  Right-left collusion in Putin's American fans. The Jeffrey Sachs case

Read the full article
on Leggo.it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *