Scientific consensus: Whatever the facts and delusions, it is necessary to follow the consensus taken from above. Because then you are a good person. Historically, affirmation of consent is the first resort of the bad guys; It is a way to avoid discussion by pretending that the matter has already been settled
It is difficult to hide the harm of a vaccine. Almost everyone knows someone who has suffered some form of injury, and sudden and unexpected deaths among younger age groups and athletes are well known to many. However, there are no mass protests.
One strategy that has been consistently pursued since the beginning is the demand for a “scientific consensus”. In a recently published study, it became abundantly clear that this is religion, the opposite of science. The study was sponsored by a foundation that awards religious advancement awards. The study suggests that whatever the facts and delusions are, the consensus issued from above must be followed. Because then you are a good person.
Michael Crichton explained very well what to think about the consensus of science in a talk at Caltech, Pasadena California, on January 17, 2003:
“I think consensus science is a very harmful development and it must be stopped now. Historically, affirmation of consent is the first resort of the bad guys; It is a way to avoid discussion by pretending that the matter has already been settled. Whenever you hear that scientists agree on something, grab your wallet because you will be scammed… To be clear, Science work is not unanimous. Consent is a matter of policy. On the other hand, in science it only takes one researcher to be right in the sense that he has results that can be verified against the real world. In science, consensus is irrelevant. What matters are the reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If there is a consensus, it is not science. If it is a science, then this is not a consensus. a point.”
A 2009 paper cited by Michael Crichton states:
Today the methods of reaching consensus have changed, but the outcome can be the same: the death of the soul. The use and abuse of “consensus science” is at least partially responsible for the current crisis in the scientific and medical review system. While peer review is considered one of the sacred pillars of the scientific edifice, it has long been criticized for controlling access to publications and funding, bringing the issue to prominence.
It is clear that many of the studies are designed to survive the review, even at the preprint and first publication stage. The real results are framed by religious confessions and statements like “vaccination saved millions of lives.” Exactly these textual pieces of studies can then be found in corporate media, and that’s okay.
source: https://tkp.at/2023/06/02/strategien-zur-reduktion-und-leugnung-der-impfschaeden/
Read the latest news at www.presskit.it
You may also be interested in: Everything Didn’t Go Right. We had 188,000 dead, sir. Eric Grimaldi
Don’t forget: Vaccine deaths: €77,000 is the cost of life for the Italian state
Lest we forget: reported vaccine deaths from 1990 to the present: the increase in the last two years is unprecedented
Lest we forget: “lethal outcomes,” mortality, post-vaccine. “Can I remove?” , so as not to be published in the monitoring report
Lest we forget: FIFA: + 300% more footballers died than in the previous 12 years after Covid vaccines
Lest we forget: Sudden deaths among athletes increased by 3,800%
Lest we forget: Pfizer Didn’t Do Tissue Tests on the Dead, “The Vaccine Would Never Have Been Approved,” Steve Kirsch
Lest we forget: Australia’s shocking excess deaths: more than 22,000 deaths in 2022, nearly 16 times the peak of the pandemic
You may also be interested in: Vaccine deaths: Research in the Journal of Clinical Medicine explains the causes
You may also be interested in: Video Documentary In Which Two Eminent Cardiologists Talk About Sudden Vaccine Deaths
Lest we forget: the Italian trick to keep vaccine mortality rates low: if it happens after 14 days it won’t count
You may also be interested in: Pfizer Files: 22% of patients are gone, 3.7% are dead, and 35% are not cured at the time of review. approved vaccine
Follow us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/presskit.it
Follow us on Sphero: https://sfero.me/users/presskit-quotidiano-on-line
Follow us on Telegram https://t.me/presskit
“Infuriatingly humble social media buff. Twitter advocate. Writer. Internet nerd.”
