Turin – From hidden to public in minutes. The paper requested by Juventus’ defense, the now famous memo 10940, is now in the hands of the lawyers: it is Cheney’s six-page response to the Covisoc memorandum dated March 31, 2021, the latter as yet unknown and which is now another interesting case. But let’s go back to the note: it is a letter from the Federal Prosecutor’s Office with explanatory clarifications about capital gains and the definition of “phantom” and “system” where the word Juventus is never mentioned.
No “crime reports”
Federal Prosecutor Giuseppe Chine He wrote on April 14, 2021: “On the basis of these considerations in law, which this public prosecutor’s office cannot ignore in the exercise of its investigative and prosecutorial powers, it is clear that the exercise of disciplinary proceedings in this matter, in a systematic reasoning for continuity with respect to assessments already made in previous relevant disciplinary cases that Checked, may be useful for prosecution Where sufficient elements appear to prove the need for investigation In cases which reasonably indicate the existence of player exchanges between two or more professional clubs, in terms of the systematic nature of the same market operations, rather than an episodic operation, intended to overestimate the balance sheet data of the clubs themselves through, precisely, the ccdd system . capital gainsJust a phrase.where sufficient elements appear to confirm the need for investigation.” It appears to show no news of a crime as claimed instead several times by black and white lawyers examining the document word for word. Obviously, in order to fully assess the value of this correspondence, it must be fully available, as well as read what Covisoc has requested. Correspondence may not end with this one-on-one exchange.
How important is the date of revocation of the capital gains ruling
That there was a reference to this note in the assignment deed which gave rise to Judgment -15 may be essential from a legal point of view. The question is already known, and would relate specifically to the official defect to be examined by Coni: if this observation was one of the reasons behind the referral, this must have started earlier and the person executed would not have respected the deadlines given, in short, it would have been be outside the time limit. It will be one of the theses that Juventus’ defense will present before the College of Justice to identify the procedural defect, but it is not the only defect.
© Reproduction Reserved
“Award-winning beer geek. Extreme coffeeaholic. Introvert. Avid travel specialist. Hipster-friendly communicator.”